Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал: http://188.190.33.55:7980/jspui/handle/123456789/14896
Повний запис метаданих
Поле DCЗначенняМова
dc.contributor.authorPasko, Oleh-
dc.contributor.authorBalla, Inna-
dc.contributor.authorLevytska, Inna-
dc.contributor.authorSemenyshena, Nataliia-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-18T08:19:24Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-18T08:19:24Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citation[Odpowiedzialność w zakresie zrównoważonego rozwoju w Europie Środkowej i Wschodniej: Empiryczna ocena audytu zrównoważonego rozwoju] Comparative Economic ResearchArticle Open Access2021 DOI: 10.18778/1508-2008.24.20Copy to clipboarduk
dc.identifier.urihttp://188.190.33.55:7980/jspui/handle/123456789/14896-
dc.description.abstractThe paper explores how companies from Central and Eastern Europe adopt assurance practices to provide accountability for sustainability. Drawing on modified coding rules from prior research, a conventional content analysis of 36 assurance statements companies from nine countries was conducted. The results imply differences in the content of reports, processes, and implementation of the standards. Exclusively large and multinational enterprises from the energy sectors domiciled in Poland and Hungary are a typical portrait of a company from the study's sample, striving to issue and assure sustainability reporting. Of the nine countries represent- ed in the study, sustainability assurance statements of companies from Poland, Hun- gary, and Romania tend to excel in terms of quality. The vast majority of assurance providers belong to the Big Four, who use ISAE3000 as opposed to AA1100AS. Yet, irrespective of the assurance provider type, stakeholders are neglected. It is argued that just transferring the experience of financial auditing to the field of sustainability, which, by and large, has taken place, is not an option. Authors state that following this route, we are heading in the wrong direction, and in technical terms, the wider proliferation of AA1100AS and its principles, with greater emphasis on reasonable assurance as opposed to the limited and enhanced role of stakeholders, are vital to get back on track. The paper contributes to the emerging literature on accountability standards and stresses the need to enhance sustainability-related assurance. © by the author, licensee Łódź University - Łódź University Press, Łódź, Poland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Author keywords Assurance statement; Auditing; Corporate social responsibility; GRI; Reporting; Sustainability reportinguk
dc.language.isoenuk
dc.titleAccountability on sustainability in Central and Eastern Europe: An empirical assessment of sustainability-related assuranceuk
dc.typeArticleuk
dc.identifier.doiDOI: 10.18778/1508-2008.24.20Copy to clipboarduk
Розташовується у зібраннях:Статті

Файли цього матеріалу:
Файл Опис РозмірФормат 
С_Accountability onSustainability inCentral andEastern Europe.pdf476,29 kBAdobe PDFПереглянути/Відкрити


Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.